The intention and ability of radical Islam to attack continuously against any non-Muslim system must be taken more seriously. They have the means and the mindset to continue sacrificing their own people until victory is theirs. It looks as if Muslim elites have become enamoured with the West, and you point out the protests in Tehran, but this cursory dismissal runs counter to the trend. When you add support from Western “anti-elitists”, mostly from the left, we can see the movement swelling. Already, Westerners have come on board on the side of rape and the use of human shields if the enemy is sufficiently “impure”. That’s a massive shift in one generation. Not coincidentally, “Purity” is itself a key pillar of the Death cult that the West has no answer for.
Starting off by suggesting that 'The End of History' does not actually mean that, the article seems to continue by quoting numerous references to historical development, including references to economic and democratic developments or 'systems'. But can we assume that a history which has - by being able to operate in relative secrecy - deliberately disadvantaged 90% of the population, be able to continue in the present-day environment of knowledge-sharing by social media? What happens when the 90% begin to understand they are being screwed?
Will the establishment in UK be able to continue its now openly displayed, ages-old, gross mistreatment of its population once it is recognised that what is called 'democracy' is actually a constitutional system of 800 years of rules and laws created by elites to protect elites, and that 'democracy' can never be seen as successful until it embraces representatives chosen and nominated by the voters rather than chosen by groups of mostly incompetent elites (called political parties) who the voters are allowed to vote for?
At least the Chinese are honest about their government system.
The intention and ability of radical Islam to attack continuously against any non-Muslim system must be taken more seriously. They have the means and the mindset to continue sacrificing their own people until victory is theirs. It looks as if Muslim elites have become enamoured with the West, and you point out the protests in Tehran, but this cursory dismissal runs counter to the trend. When you add support from Western “anti-elitists”, mostly from the left, we can see the movement swelling. Already, Westerners have come on board on the side of rape and the use of human shields if the enemy is sufficiently “impure”. That’s a massive shift in one generation. Not coincidentally, “Purity” is itself a key pillar of the Death cult that the West has no answer for.
Starting off by suggesting that 'The End of History' does not actually mean that, the article seems to continue by quoting numerous references to historical development, including references to economic and democratic developments or 'systems'. But can we assume that a history which has - by being able to operate in relative secrecy - deliberately disadvantaged 90% of the population, be able to continue in the present-day environment of knowledge-sharing by social media? What happens when the 90% begin to understand they are being screwed?
Will the establishment in UK be able to continue its now openly displayed, ages-old, gross mistreatment of its population once it is recognised that what is called 'democracy' is actually a constitutional system of 800 years of rules and laws created by elites to protect elites, and that 'democracy' can never be seen as successful until it embraces representatives chosen and nominated by the voters rather than chosen by groups of mostly incompetent elites (called political parties) who the voters are allowed to vote for?
At least the Chinese are honest about their government system.